When the documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, featuring Ben Stein, hit theaters back in April, I didn’t go see it. In fact, I made it a point to deliberately avoid it, mainly because I’m not a fan of propaganda movies from any extreme, whether they feature Ben Stein or Michael Moore. And when you have the primary figure in the documentary, Stein, claiming in an interview with TBN that, “Love of God and compassion and empathy leads you to a very glorious place, and science leads you to killing people,” it’s not hard to guess what the main point of the movie will be, what kind of statement they’re trying to make. Whenever I hear representatives of opposing ideologies blame the other for atrocities and claim their opponent’s philosophy is what led to those acts (in this case, Stein claiming Darwinism is to blame for Hitler, and Richard Dawkins – interviewed in the film – asserting the root of evil is religion), I always think of two kids standing in the middle of the schoolyard, pointing and yelling at each other, “nuh uh, it’s your fault!”
In the chapter The Church is Responsible for So Much Injustice, in his book, The Reason for God, Tim Keller writes,
“Violence done in the name of Christianity is a terrible reality and must be both addressed and redressed. There is no excusing it. In the twentieth century, however, violence has been inspired as much be secularism as by moral absolutism. Societies that have rid themselves of all religion have been just as oppressive as those steeped in it. We can only conclude that there is some violent impulse so deeply rooted in the human heart that it expresses itself regardless of what the beliefs of a particular society might be – whether socialist or capitalist, whether religious or irreligious, whether individualistic or hierarchical. Ultimately, then, the fact of violence and warfare in a society is no necessary refutation of the prevailing beliefs of that society.”
I ended up watching Expelled last week with some friends, and later wished I hadn’t wasted the time. One big problem I have with films like Expelled is that they deliberately paint a black and white picture, ignoring the fact that issues are complicated in real life and hoping their viewers don’t have the mental capacity to see past their broad brush statements. Stein has stated in interviews that they deliberately chose people to interview on the extreme sides of each issue, avoiding people in the middle because they “didn’t want to confuse people.” I would have loved to have seen an interview with Dr. Francis Collins, former director of the Human Genome Project, a Christian and a highly respected scientist, who also happens to believe in evolution, explaining his beliefs included in this film. Instead we get the producer claiming in a New York Times interview that Dr. Collins holds his beliefs only because he is “toeing the party line,” an assertion Collins calls “ludicrous.” (On a side note, click here for a fascinating interview with Dr. Collins about his work on the human genome project and his belief in God, among other things.)
At the end of the day, though, I fall in line behind author Madeleine L’Engle (A Wrinkle in Time, Walking on Water), who said in an interview, “Somebody once asked me in a college setting what I thought about creationism versus evolution. I said, “I can’t get very excited about it. There’s only one question that’s worth asking, and that is, did God make it? If the answer is yes, then why get so excited about how?”
Good quotes, both from the book and from L’Engle.
I’ve not seen the movie, pretty much for the same reasons you stated. The whole teaching of evolution vs. intelligent design has been a hot topic in Texas this week – it’s being addressed by the Texas School board and something like 98% of Texas science teachers said not to teach about problems with the theory of evolution. The real problem here is the black/white view that the school board, teachers, and populace seem to be taking.
I glanced through a string of comments to an article on the Houston Chronicle’s website and found this one thing to be true: people are being idiots and shouting at each other out of spite, with no real reasoning being their arguments. There were numerous comments along the lines of “what’s next? question the atomic theory or gravity or relativity?” To a scientist the answer is a resounding YES. It’s by questioning atomic theory that we have discarded a half-dozen flawed models and come to the present one in use. It’s by questioning everything, not taking any assumption for granted, that discovery and advances in knowledge are made. In the Texas school board case, it comes down to not teaching evolution and the problems with it but down to not teaching ID at any cost. But the two are not identical actions, and no one wants to hear this.
Sorry for the venting here, but you raised a good forum for it.
Agreed. I read where someone wondered why Walt Ruloff, the producer of the film who sold a software company he’d started to Microsoft in the early 90’s for $120 million, didn’t start up and fund a think-tank for Intelligent Design if he thinks it isn’t being given a fair shake in the science world. For it to be taken seriously, there need to be position papers exploring the theory, research, etc., or at the very least grant proposals for that kind of research.
Another ridiculous moment in the film is where Stein gets Richard Dawkins to posit what he thinks the “first cause” might have been, and the film treats it as a “got-you” moment trying to make Dawkins look ridiculous, when in fact he is positing basically the same thing ID-proponents claim.